[Maelwys]

...because the Card Pool search relies on a binary encoding scheme I've not yet managed to decipher.

Comment your code!

Actually, I'm pretty sure the binary encoding is commented in at least 2 places, because otherwise I'd forget myself. It just might be commented in a shorthand that nobody but me understands...

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[AllenGould]

...because the Card Pool search relies on a binary encoding scheme I've not yet managed to decipher.

Comment your code!

Actually, I'm pretty sure the binary encoding is commented in at least 2 places, because otherwise I'd forget myself. It just might be commented in a shorthand that nobody but me understands...

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Also, comments work better for "why" than "what". (Speaking as someone who has had to decode past-me's crappy comments.)

[BCSWowbagger]

Well, I never found the comments, but Deckbuilder is fixed now. The code is hideous but it'll get me through this weekend's last-minute Block deckbuilding. (I kept a backup in case I think of a simpler solution.)

(P.S. Maelwys, why not make the cards on the Block Core List block-legal, rather than making it its own entirely separate thing? If "WHERE legality&8=8" worked for both Block and Block Core List, all your original code would work without alteration. But I figured there was probably a reason for the separation, so I avoided editing the cards in the database and just worked around it.)

[eberlems]

Hawk
When aboard, your ship may treat each nebula as if its span were reduced by 1.

[frakkingoff]

To be clear, the period at the end of Hawk's special skill is missing in the database entry. (I think that's what eberlems is getting at?)

[eberlems]

To be clear, the period at the end of Hawk's special skill is missing in the database entry. (I think that's what eberlems is getting at?)

correct

[PantsOfTheTalShiar]

Well, I never found the comments, but Deckbuilder is fixed now. The code is hideous but it'll get me through this weekend's last-minute Block deckbuilding. (I kept a backup in case I think of a simpler solution.)

Thanks for your efforts in fixing this. One other bug report: The "view deck" page doesn't show that a Block deck is legal in the Block Card Pool even though the deckbuilder page does: https://www.trekcc.org/1e/decklists/ind ... ckID=16850

[adf8]

Any chance card image sources will be added for the newer sets and conversions updated?

[nobthehobbit]

The database text for Holographic Settlement specifies "your Yaderan colony," but the card does not specify "your".

[eberlems]

is the new Colonel Kira a new version of Kira Nerys (Blockade Commander)? The images look very similar and the new cards lore starts with the subtitle of the old 2E BC version.

[Iron Prime]

Based on 1E Kira's lore it looks like it's a conversion. I'm not sure how to flag that though so we'll have to wait for Maelwys....

[BCSWowbagger]

It is a conversion of Blockade Commander.

Here in the waning days of 2E backwards compatibility, I'm not certain how carefully the block converted cards list is being kept up (not my department), but Warp Pack Kira === 10 U 54.

[winterflames]

How long has there been a Restriction Box Search?!

Plus, if you search for "If" in the restriction box search, couple icon cards pop up...

[frakkingoff]

Damar's lore incorrectly uses the word "board" rather than the correct "aboard."

[adf8]

Any chance the outstanding episode names will be added to LLaP and that conversions (e.g., Strange New Worlds) will be updated as errata and have the 2E pictures changed?

Thank you!
-Alan

Just out of curiosity, who owns this and could you use any help?