#411263
Basically, there were some VERY last minute changes to the definition of "virus-related" that left me with an out-of-date tag, and left them with a redundant mention on the card.
jrch5618 wrote:General: The old "Khan-related personnel" tag is redundant now that we have the new "Khan-related card" tag. The former should be discontinued. (It looks sloppy to have both on Khan-related personnel cards.)As I mentioned in another thread, the two tags have different requirements (one only looks at lore, the other looks at title or lore). I'm not happy with it either, but because the designers chose to use different wording I didn't have much choice in the matter. Maybe we can get the errata team to update Revenge to the newer wording, then we can get rid of the double categories.
jrch5618 wrote:Virus-Related Dilemmas:You should ask the Designers about that in the Q&A thread.
Not sure if Microvirus counts as virus-related for it doesn't have the word 'virus' by itself - but the word 'microvirus'. Same with Yuta and The Vengeance Factor which are not listed - either all should be added or not. (Probably not.)
On the other side, the following should be added: Aphasia Device, Difficult Disposal, Nanobiogeni Fugitives, No Loose Ends, and Pawns of the Military itself.
... wait, why was Aphasia Device specifically called out on Pawns of the Military? It _is_ a virus-related dilemma.
Basically, there were some VERY last minute changes to the definition of "virus-related" that left me with an out-of-date tag, and left them with a redundant mention on the card.
Chris Lobban
Continuing Committee - Chief Programmer and Message Board Administrator
My Steam Account
Continuing Committee - Chief Programmer and Message Board Administrator
My Steam Account