For posting text-only dream cards (no graphical cards or links to sites hosting such cards) and for speculation on future sets.
User avatar
 
By GooeyChewie (Nathan Miracle)
 - Gamma Quadrant
 -  
Continuing Committee Member - Retired
Architect
#383806
Welcome to Fill in the Blank Season 2: Chain of Command!

Each week I will post the collector’s information for one of the cards in the set’s cardlist. Contestants are free to create whatever card they see fit for that slot in the cardlist, keeping in mind the surrounding cards. As the contest progresses, the cardlist will become more and more defined, guiding the contests’ choices.

The theme of our set is Chain of Command. Not every card has to fit the theme, of course, but it’s something to keep in mind when voting. Speaking of voting, as per normal each contestant will vote for one of the previous week’s entries (with the exception that as the contest runner, I will vote ONLY in the case of a tie).

This week’s winner by tiebreaker is… MattgomeryScott!
MattgomeryScott wrote: [SF] 4 *Enterprise, Trailblazer

[Cmd]
[Pa] NX Class

While your Corresponding Commander is aboard this ship, it is attributes +2.
While your Corresponding Commander is aboard this ship, each [SF] [Stf] personnel (except [AU] and MACO personnel) aboard this ship is attributes +1.

"I hope nobody is in a big hurry to get home. Starfleet seems to think that we're ready to begin our mission."

Range: 6, Weapons: 5, Shields: 5.
By MattgomeryScott



Here are this week’s entries:
Entry A wrote: [S] 2 Authorization Code
Image
Place this dilemma on this mission and end this mission attempt. To attempt this mission, you must have three Officer personnel or this ship's corresponding Commander. When this mission is completed, remove this dilemma from the game.
"One-seven-three-four-six-seven-three-two-one-four-seven-six-Charlie-three-two-seven-eight-nine-seven-seven-seven-six-four-three-Tango-seven-three-two-Victor-seven-three-one-one-seven-eight-eight-eight-seven-three-two-four-seven-six-seven-eight-nine-seven-six-four-three-seven-six. Lock."
Entry B wrote: [S] / [P] 3 A Forced Peace

Unless you have three personnel with [Fut] or an Admiral and 3 Diplomacy
Randomly stop 2 personnel present and place this dilemma in your core.
Dilemma's owner may remove it from game to prevent a combat or engagement.

The treaty was agreed to under the threat of the Organians immobilizing both side's space forces if they did not cooperate
Entry C wrote: [S] 3 Chains of Command
All your personnel are stopped. If you have 2 Leadership or Officer or a Commander aboard their corresponding ship, you may instead choose a personnel to be killed.
"That's what this was all about, wasn't it – to see if I'd order someone to their death?"
Entry D wrote: [D] (2) Balancing Act
Each player scores 5 points.
"Mind if I join you?"
Entry E wrote: [D] (4) Acquired Tactics
Randomly select personnel until you select one who does not have Officer, Security, or [Cmd] . Unless you choose to stop all selected personnel, place this card in your core.
While this card is in your core, you may not begin combat or engagements.
"The knowledge and experience of the Human, Picard, is part of us now. It has prepared us for all possible courses of action. Your resistance is hopeless..."
Entry F wrote: [S] (4) Devastating Message
Your opponent chooses one non-Commander personnel to be killed and unless the corresponding Commander of your ship is present stops another (random selection).
To all Starfleet personnel: this is the captain. It is my sad duty to inform you that a member of the crew, Ensign Sito Jaxa has been lost in the line of duty.
Entry G wrote: [D] (4) A Glitch in the Matrix
All your personnel are stopped. If you command at least one Hologram, you may return each Hologram you command to his or her owner's hand to prevent this.
"Freeze programme. La Forge to Barclay."
"Barclay here."
"Reg, something went wrong with the holodeck programme again."
Entry H wrote: [D] 2 Ambitious Underling

Unless you choose a [Stf] personnel to be placed in your opponent's brig, your opponent chooses a [Cmd] personnel to be killed and this dilemma returns to it's owner's dilemma pile.

“No one will question the assassination of a captain who has disobeyed prime orders of the Empire."
Entry I wrote: [D] (2) By the Book
Your opponent may choose a personnel who does not have a skill to complete this mission to be stopped.
"You're hiding... hiding behind rules and regulations."
Entry J wrote: [S] (0) Awkward Silence
Dilemma
End this mission attempt (personnel involved are not stopped).
"Two hours, thirty seven minutes, thirteen seconds. That's how long we've gone without verbal communication."




Please remember to vote for one of these entries in your post, referencing the entry’s letter.



This week’s contest is...

Card #27! Three-quarters of the way through the list, this card will help determine the affiliation breakdowns for personnel.
User avatar
 
By GooeyChewie (Nathan Miracle)
 - Gamma Quadrant
 -  
Continuing Committee Member - Retired
Architect
#383807
1. *in voting*
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.

Personnel - Bajoran

18. Rinnak Pire
GooeyChewie wrote: [Baj] (2) Rinnak Pire
Bajoran
[Cmd]
[SD] Acquisition [SD] Navigation [SD] Officer [SD] Programming
While this personnel is aboard your non-unique [Baj] ship, this personnel is the corresponding Commander of that ship.
Captain of a Bajoran transport that docked at Deep Space 9 in 2369. Commanded all manner of Bajoran vessels during his long and successful career.
Integrity 6 Cunning 5 Strength 6
By GooeyChewie

19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27. *in creation*
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.

Ships - Starfleet:

36. Enterpris, Trailblazer
MattgomeryScott wrote: [SF] 4 *Enterprise, Trailblazer

[Cmd]
[Pa] NX Class

While your Corresponding Commander is aboard this ship, it is attributes +2.
While your Corresponding Commander is aboard this ship, each [SF] [Stf] personnel (except [AU] and MACO personnel) aboard this ship is attributes +1.

"I hope nobody is in a big hurry to get home. Starfleet seems to think that we're ready to begin our mission."

Range: 6, Weapons: 5, Shields: 5.
By MattgomeryScott
User avatar
 
By Danny (Daniel Giddings)
 - Gamma Quadrant
 -  
2E British National Runner-Up 2021
#383853
Vote D
[Fed] (3) •Edward Jellico, Experienced Commander
Human
[Cmd] [TNG]
•Astrometrics •Diplomacy •Engineer •Leadership •Officer
Commander: U.S.S. Enterprise-D.
While attempting a [Car] mission, this personnel is Cunning +1 for each dilemma beneath this mission (limit +3).
"If the Cardassian Union truly wishes to discuss peace, they can send someone who can negotiate in a civilised manner."
INT 7 CUN 6 STR 6
User avatar
 
By CaptMDKirk (Matt Kirk)
 - Delta Quadrant
 -  
Continuing Committee Member - Retired
Architect
#383868
Vote F
[Fer] 0 •Tog, Extremely Relaxed
Image
[Cmd] , Ferengi
Commander: Krayton.
•Leadership •Officer
Order - Stop this personnel and your Telepathy personnel present to draw a card.
"I always know best."
Integrity 3 Cunning 4 Strength 4
 
By Peers
 - Delta Quadrant
 -  
#383890
Vote: I

[Fed] (3) * Matthew Decker, Obsessed
[Cmd] [Pa] [TOS] Human
[SD] Engineer [SD] Exobiology [SD] Officer [SD] Security
This personnel is the matching commander of any [Fed] ship he is aboard. You may play this personnel at cost +2 to place him aboard your ship at a non-headquarters mission and place the top card of your opponent's dilemma pile underneath that mission.
"I'm officially notifying you that I'm exercising my option under regulations as a Starfleet Commodore, and that I am assuming command of the Enterprise."
Integrity 4 - Cunning 6 - Strength 5
Last edited by Peers on Thu May 25, 2017 12:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
 
By Naetor
 - Delta Quadrant
 -  
#383934
I

[Fed] (4) •Worf, "Coward"
[Cmd] [TNG] Klingon
[SD] 2 Honor [SD] Leadership [SD] Officer [SD] Security
While this personnel is facing a dilemma, if you have overcome two or more dilemmas on this mission attempt, you may stop this personnel to end your mission attempt. That dilemma all remaining dilemmas in the dilemma stack are returned to their owner's dilemma pile.
"If you were any other man I would kill you where you stand."
"Get off my bridge."

I:8 C:5 S:8
 
By rferries
 - Beta Quadrant
 -  
#383986
Vote: H
[NA] 4 •Arik Soong, Patriarch
[Cmd] [Pa] Human
•3 Biology •Leadership •Medical •Science
Commander: Stolen Bird-of-Prey. While this personnel is on a planet or aboard a ship, you may play Genetically Enhanced personnel on that planet or ship. When you play a Genetically Enhanced personnel, you may discard a card from hand to download a Gentically Enhanced personnel.
"It's been a pleasure, Captain. Take my advice: go home and start learning how to speak Klingon."
Integrity 4 Cunning 7 Strength 5
A refit of Noonien Soong. "Stolen Bird-of-Prey" was used since there wasn't an official name for the ship he (and later Malik) commanded, as far as I'm aware.
 
 - Delta Quadrant
 -  
Community Contributor
#384401
Vote: A

My Entry:

[Fed] 5 *Data, Disobeying Orders

[Cmd] [TNG] Android

Astrometrics, Engineer, Honour, Officer, Programming

When your opponent uses an Order, if this personnel is present with your [TNG] Corresponding Commander aboard his or her ship, you may lose 5 points to prevent that Order. This effect lasts until the end of this turn. You may do this only once each turn.

“Captain. I believe I speak for everyone here, sir, when I say... To hell with our orders.”

Integrity: 6, Cunning: 10, Strength: 10

No idea if I have the wording on his ability right. Any thoughts?

All the Best,

Mattgomery Scott.
User avatar
 
By CaptMDKirk (Matt Kirk)
 - Delta Quadrant
 -  
Continuing Committee Member - Retired
Architect
#384469
MattgomeryScott wrote:When your opponent uses an Order, if this personnel is present with your [TNG] Corresponding Commander aboard his or her ship, you may lose 5 points to prevent that Order. This effect lasts until the end of this turn. You may do this only once each turn.

No idea if I have the wording on his ability right. Any thoughts?
Hm. I think it would need to be something along the lines of "When your opponent is about to use an Order ability, if this personnel is present with your [TNG] Commander aboard his or her corresponding ship, you may lose 5 points to prevent that Order ability from being used until the end of this turn. You may do this only once each turn."
User avatar
 
 - Delta Quadrant
 -  
#384622
Vote J

[Fer](2) •Deanna Troi, Stripped Asset
Betazoid/Human
•Anthropology •Diplomacy •Telepathy
When a dilemma this personnel faces is about to be placed in your core or returned to its owner's dilemma pile, you may return her to your hand to place that dilemma beneath your mission requiring Leadership instead.
"Why have you removed our clothing?"
Integrity 6 Cunning 5 Strength 4
User avatar
 
By GooeyChewie (Nathan Miracle)
 - Gamma Quadrant
 -  
Continuing Committee Member - Retired
Architect
#384645
[Fer] (3) •Lurin, Rascally Renegade
Ferengi
[Cmd]
[SD] Acquisition [SD] Geology [SD] Programming [SD] 2 Security [SD] 2 Treachery
Commander: U.S.S. Enterprise-D. While this personnel is aboard your U.S.S. Enterprise-D at your planet mission, add Acquisition to this mission's requirements (and alternate requirements in game text).
"I am DaiMon Lurin and I declare this ship to be a loss and open to claim according to the Ferengi Salvage Code."
Integrity 2 Cunning 6 Strength 6
User avatar
 
By GooeyChewie (Nathan Miracle)
 - Gamma Quadrant
 -  
Continuing Committee Member - Retired
Architect
#384650
Internet issues. Should be able to get the new installment up in the morning.
 
 - Delta Quadrant
 -  
Community Contributor
#385048
CaptMDKirk wrote:
MattgomeryScott wrote:When your opponent uses an Order, if this personnel is present with your [TNG] Corresponding Commander aboard his or her ship, you may lose 5 points to prevent that Order. This effect lasts until the end of this turn. You may do this only once each turn.

No idea if I have the wording on his ability right. Any thoughts?
Hm. I think it would need to be something along the lines of "When your opponent is about to use an Order ability, if this personnel is present with your [TNG] Commander aboard his or her corresponding ship, you may lose 5 points to prevent that Order ability from being used until the end of this turn. You may do this only once each turn."
Oops, forgot to update my entry. Ah well. Thanks for the advice CaptMDKirk. :D

All the Best,

Mattgomery Scott.
Crossover question

I was literally just typing up this question all[…]

Danny gets the FW against Tjark - 100 - 35 Good t[…]

Back from the old days, pre-errata Visit Cochrane[…]

@VictoryIsLife FW @jadziadax8 100-0