trekcc.org

Caretaker's Guest wrote:Yes thanks for the game!

From pfti

1) the second one can still double.[regarding Armus]

2) theoretically yes. They are banned in all 1e cc play. But I think open should allow them. [regarding 2EBC cards]

Brian, are 2EBC cards legal in this tourney?

Note: I have zero authority

Caretaker's Guest wrote:Yes thanks for the game!

From pfti

1) the second one can still double.[regarding Armus]

2) theoretically yes. They are banned in all 1e cc play. But I think open should allow them. [regarding 2EBC cards]

Brian, are 2EBC cards legal in this tourney?

I answered this above (No, not allowed) but I'll repost it here:

Armus wrote:

DarkSabre wrote:

Armus wrote:We're 48 Hours from kickoff and we have 4 registered.

Is anyone else feeling bold enough to dive into this pool of crazy?

Did you ever decide if 2EBC are in the pool? Asking for a friend

There's no decision. 2EBC cards are no longer supported in CC events as of December 2018

https://www.trekcc.org/articles/index.p ... ticle=2413

While there does remain an exception for "special scenario events" I don't consider Open, a CC-supported format, to be a "special scenario" in that context. However, if there's demand for it, I may run such a scenario in the future.

So short answer: No, 2EBC cards are NOT allowed in this event.

My apologies to your friend.

What was the Armus question?

Schade. Habe ich überlesen...

2 copies of All-consuming evil. can the remaining one double the fetched armus dilemma from the first.

Caretaker's Guest wrote:2 copies of All-consuming evil. can the remaining one double the fetched armus dilemma from the first.

Yes, that works.

Here's your Round 2 pairings:

Michael Van Breemen (The Ninja Scot) vs. Austin Chandler (Darksabre)

Brian Sykes (Armus) vs. Dan Hamman (SirDan)

Sebastian Kirstein (Caretaker's Guest) vs. BYE

If possible, please try to have your next game in by Saturday (8/15).

Good luck, everyone!

Sorry due to personal reasons I am needing to drop out of the tournament

SirDan loses to Armus in a modified fashion, final score was 65-100

Sykes MW Dan 100-65

Yeah, you read that right....

Good game, sir! lots of fun!

DarkSabre wrote:Sorry due to personal reasons I am needing to drop out of the tournament

Sorry to hear that Austin - I hope everything is ok!

That leaves 4 people in the tournament... so I'm going to modify the round 2 pairings.

Since Dan and I have already played, we'll call that the Round 3 game. With Austin dropping the Round 2 Pairings will look like this:

Michael Van Breemen (The Ninja Scot) vs. Brian Sykes (Armus)

Dan Hamman (SirDan) vs. Sebastian Kirstein (Caretaker's Guest)


And the Round 3 Pairings would then be:

Michael Van Breemen (The Ninja Scot) vs. Sebastian Kirstein (Caretaker's Guest)

Brian Sykes (Armus) vs. Dan Hamman (SirDan)

So at this point all pairings are set. Please try to have all of your games in by NEXT Saturday (8/22) though in reality there's some room in the schedule to flex up to a week.

I won 100-0.

Michael

Besides the little flaw I am again intrigued by the creativity.

To Dan: No matter what happens, you will win 100:0, cause I had to change my deck during rounds cause I got 2EBC cards in it round 1. So you get the win in any case.

100:0 for Sir Dan

Thanks for the game!

We played it out though and Dan was navigating patiently around shenanigans and won the actual game too. 100:35

Thank you for the engaging play! Certainly a head scratchier.

In a fitting end to a crazy event, Sykes and MVB True Tie 0-0.

That gives MVB the Tournament Win with 10 VPs to my 9.

Results have been submitted. Congrats to MVB on the win and thanks to everyone for playing in this crazy old format!

Results are now final. Please post decklists!