#467394
LORE wrote:With this many options in each of these 3 polls, I would like to humbly suggest we chop away at the list with another series of heats, taking the top 4 or so from each heat and moving on. It just feels like there are lots of votes floating around on options with no chance of advancing. If we recast the top options from these 3 polls in a mix with those that had multiple nominations initially, and then see how it shakes out, maybe we get a clearer winner.Given the sheer number of entries, I'm inclined to move to round 2 as planned, but once we're there we'll still have 14 options to choose from. At that stage, I was planning on automatically having one runoff for the top three, but you make a good point. Perhaps we could go top 14 -> top 7 -> top 3, cutting down more gradually in order to get a clearer winner.