[Naetor]

Hand Weapon.
Order - Destroy your Q event that costs 3 or more and remove this equipment from the game to begin combat involving your personnel. If you win, choose a non-headquarters mission you command. The opponent on your left places the top three dilemmas of their dilemma pile beneath that mission. Otherwise, you lose the game.

Hand Weapon. While in combat, each of your El-Aurian personnel present is Strength +3. When combat begins involving your personnel with Integrity>7 present, you may remove this equipment from the game to prevent that and stop each personnel involved.

Will you lose the game doing this? Prevent = Otherwise?

[Armus]

Hand Weapon.
Order - Destroy your Q event that costs 3 or more and remove this equipment from the game to begin combat involving your personnel. If you win, choose a non-headquarters mission you command. The opponent on your left places the top three dilemmas of their dilemma pile beneath that mission. Otherwise, you lose the game.

Hand Weapon. While in combat, each of your El-Aurian personnel present is Strength +3. When combat begins involving your personnel with Integrity>7 present, you may remove this equipment from the game to prevent that and stop each personnel involved.

Will you lose the game doing this? Prevent = Otherwise?

I would say prevent = prevent everything. Costs remain paid, the rest doesn't happen.

I'm not 100% on that though, so if Rules Mistress Amber rolls in here and tells me I'm wrong, it wouldn't totally shock me.

[Naetor]

Well thematically it makes sense that Guinan stops Q. No idea though.

[bhosp]

As far as I know, we didn’t think of this very funny interaction.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Armus]

As far as I know, we didn’t think of this very funny interaction.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't think it's a big deal. Costs are paid, effects are prevented. Losing the game is an effect of not winning the battle. If the battle is cancelled, then there's no effect.

This doesn't need to be hard.

[bhosp]

As far as I know, we didn’t think of this very funny interaction.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't think it's a big deal. Costs are paid, effects are prevented. Losing the game is an effect of not winning the battle. If the battle is cancelled, then there's no effect.

This doesn't need to be hard.

I want a cancelled Q gun battle make you lose the game. I want more ways for you to screw up and lose the game with it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Armus]

As far as I know, we didn’t think of this very funny interaction.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't think it's a big deal. Costs are paid, effects are prevented. Losing the game is an effect of not winning the battle. If the battle is cancelled, then there's no effect.

This doesn't need to be hard.

I want a cancelled Q gun battle make you lose the game. I want more ways for you to screw up and lose the game with it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Talk to Rules Mistress Amber. I'm working on about 85-90% certainty.

[Boffo97]

Talk to Rules Mistress Amber. I'm working on about 85-90% certainty.

1E has an app for that...