More opinions from the guy who doesn't want other opinions to be heard, now that he's put forward his own!
stressedoutatumc wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:27 pm
I was agreeing that if you are not EQ in an alternative account, you are every bit as unnecessarily toxic and aggressively invasive as he is.
Quotes, or it didn't happen!
Too, you take specific parts of a statement and misrepresent them to try and justify your own unsolicited opinion.
Quotes, or it didn't happen!
(Also, I'm curious as to who you think solicited
your opinion. Or is that your unsolicited opinion is inherently more valid than my equally unsolicited opinion?).
So, I agreed with the poster on his assumption you are, indeed, also Ensign Q, then backed out as to not appear that I was interfering or disagreeing with the ruling.
So you made a ridiculous, unsupportable accusation and then innocently "backed out" after that? Is that kind of like how the arsonist
slinks away backs out
after setting a fire?
Again, you are being unnecessarily toxic by misrepresenting the situation.
In what way did I represent a situation? And how was that a
misrepresentation?
For those playing along at home, I'm happy to point out the situation that
you misrepresented, and continue to misrepresent.
Again, we are adults, be better.
Whoah, whoah, whoah. "We" means "You" and "I."
I am not the one accusing people (and in multiple threads) of being someone else, simply because they disagree with me.
I am not the one making unsupportable accusations and tearing down opinions (while ignoring pretty objective questions and arguments), and then following up with a call for no one else to be heard because (now that I've given my two cents?), the thread has "run its course."
So don't lump
me in with
you. There is no "we."
You know what I really think?
I think you don't like Ensign Q and you are happy he's being banned. But you know it's possible that it was done in a really piss-poor, lousy, way, outside of any reasonable process, and that makes you worried that the end result (Ensign Q getting banned) is on shaky ground and so might go away somehow. So in order to prevent that, you start making wild accusations about people who are calling attention to the fact that that "process" is piss-poor, while calling for the topic itself to be scuttled and buried away, so that no one has to actually confront the hard questions being asked about the process (or lack thereof).
You can't confront the arguments, so you confront the arguer (or try to silence the argument from being made).
Like I said before in this thread, Ensign Q is behaving pretty abominably. But he isn't the only one, and the others should be equally ashamed of themselves.