#571769
I have no skin in the game here, and I am not revealing whether or not I agree with this ban, however:
Firstly, this ban should not have been presented by @Clerasil ToB, it should have been presented by @LORE, or not at all.
Secondly, this is not a Local ban so it should not have been posted in this particular forum.
And Thirdly, if you intend to ban ANYONE from Official Tournament Play, you have a duty to at least, on a general level, advise what constituted the ban so as to warn other players from potentially taking the same action(s), especially since this ban is unpresented.
Generally speaking:
I am not saying you need to disclose what was said, such as " Player X revealed that Player Y is using "this" strategy in Tournament Z", but instead say " Player X revealed an opponent's strategy during an ongoing tournament to other players of that tournament."
Instead of saying "Player X told Player Y to "Kill himself", instead say "Player X made threats against another community member." Notice whether this occurred during a tournament or not is irrelevant.
Because you are announcing whom is being banned, their is no way to shelter the identity of Player X, but there is no reason to disclose whom Player Y is nor is it the community's business whom Player Y is. If someone is a registered sex offender, that person is known and made known to the public, but the public does not get a list of all those against whom that offender violated.
You also do not have to reveal exactly how many times Player X has made each offence, simply that the behavior has been observed multiple times, and that Player X has been warned after each offence necessitating the ban.
I am really saddened that this format was not used.
Last edited by Professor Scott on Thu Feb 10, 2022 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TrekCC Trademanager
Haves
TrekCC Trademanager
Wants
card1 lives matter!!
jadziadax8 wrote:Dammit, too many tabs open!
Maggie, I think it's time to step away from the bar!
Zing!
The Ninja Scot wrote:
Michael,
eater of food
Armus wrote:
This isn't 2e.