#411393
Davey1983 wrote:I define broken links as a specifically-named card that doesn't exist - a card group or gametext reference that should refer to a group but has 0-1 members - or a matching commander/romance pairing that doesn't exist. A few 6th-Rule references are in there too. If you have any issues with my list I will gladly listen. (I will note that the designers agree with this for they closed several 'only one member in a group' links in Cold Front.)Rachmaninoff wrote: A weirder case: Klaestron Outpost can be built where there is a Klaestron ENGINEER. But all Klaestron personnel currently in the game have ENGINEER. So "Klaestron ENGINEER" is redundant unless one day there would be a Klaestron personnel without ENGINEER. Is this a broken link?In short-- no. The card is looking for a group, in this case the group of Klaestron Engineers. There are multiple Klaestron engineers, so the card has a group it can target.
Being redundant doesn't mean it is a broken link. A broken link (as this topic defines them-- I actually disagree a little with this definition) is whatever group is called out by another card. No card calls out non-engineering Klaestrons. (For the record, I believe a broken link should only be a card that is specifically named, but it appears most people disagree with me on that point)
Finally, it is not redundant. While all Klaestrons (currently) are engineers, not all engineers are Klaestrons.