Ray of justice wrote:
The one dilemma off the top of my head that always stops me is exclusive decision. All major leaders or padd. It stops me alot which is why I started putting medical padd from voyager in every deck. It is a example of a general card. There is a engineering padd too. Those are only 2 general padds in the game. Just one example for you.
Yes,
Executive Authorization is one wall dilemma that's not skill-based, and will sometimes need particular care. One general way past it is a
PADD -- and there are a handful that are not restricted by affiliation(ish): Medical and Engineering, as you found, but also Science and
Trilithium Weapon Control PADD. All will give certain boosts to certain people depending on classification, or in the case of the last one, skills. But then, every deck doesn't need an affiliation-free solution. In a Federation deck, you can use the Federation PADD instead. Same for several other affiliations. A few of the PADDs with affiliation names will even boost other affiliations based on an icon (
or
).
But many decks will also be able to pass this dilemma by using one of the other listed characteristics, and not have to fall back on a PADD. Many personnel that a typical deck is probably already using will be able to satisfy the requirements. I won't list every example from the card, but I'll note that most
decks use the
Borg Queen, most
decks use a Grand Nagus (often
Zek), and most
decks use someone who's a Founder. Plus, these keywords often get snuck onto new personnel that you wouldn't normally expect to have them, like
Morulla,
Jeremy Lucas,
Lissan, and
Ranjen Koral.
Ethan Novakovich is a card that was apparently built around checking as many "characteristic" boxes as possible.
In my recent decks, I haven't had to put anyone in just because of Exec. The personnel I've been using anyway could pass it, including:
General K'Vagh
Lissan and
V'Las
Regent Worf
Kai Opaka and
Winn Adami