This forums is for questions, answers, and discussion about First Edition rules, formats, and expansions.
User avatar
First Edition Rules Master
By BCSWowbagger (James Heaney)
 - First Edition Rules Master
 -  
Community Contributor
#478336
sexecutioner wrote:FUN FACT: It probably didn't help that I added a card which may cause a bit of controversy among the community.
*scratches head*

4753?
User avatar
First Edition Creative Manager
By KazonPADD (Paddy Tye)
 - First Edition Creative Manager
 -  
1E European Continental Runner-Up 2023
1E Omarion Nebula Regional Champion 2024
#478358
BCSWowbagger wrote:
sexecutioner wrote:FUN FACT: It probably didn't help that I added a card which may cause a bit of controversy among the community.
*scratches head*

4753?
4964
User avatar
First Edition Rules Master
By BCSWowbagger (James Heaney)
 - First Edition Rules Master
 -  
Community Contributor
#478359
Ohhh. That one wasn't in my top 10 guesses, tbqh.

(Hey, we can do Enigma icons in UP now! Nice!)
User avatar
First Edition Rules Master
By BCSWowbagger (James Heaney)
 - First Edition Rules Master
 -  
Community Contributor
#478360
BCSWowbagger wrote:Ohhh. That one wasn't in my top 10 guesses, tbqh.
Probably because of the clever Creative on it, come to think of it.
 
 - Beta Quadrant
 -  
#478473
Discovery suxs wrote: Honestly no but decipher made all that stuff for tos romulans and klingons. There was not 1 na, romulan, or Klingon engineer. So just was pointing out something overlooked by decipher.

Basically I want to make a deck based off the classic distruper.
i dont think decipher was trying to make romulans 23rd century playable on there own.

which was probably the right move.
Crossover question

Mr. Glossary says: The incident is discarded o[…]

Legal Format Section Missing?

Have you tried reopening the deck in Deck builder […]

HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!

Happy birthday to my homie @MrVorlon !

Danny gets the FW against Tjark - 100 - 35 Good t[…]