[BCSWowbagger]

Side note, but if you're really good at placing images, you can help us out by doing just that. Follow that link, click on one of the categories that interests you, and you can identify images or correct mistakes.

-crp

Side note to the side note: this is usually an incredibly discouraging exercise in sadness, because the images to identify can be really hard*...

...but the week after a set releases is when the easy-pickings options are all there. I literally just got to identify the source of the new 2E card Rascals. Can you guess what episode that's from?

*I have spent actual hours trying to find the image source of Military Assault Command Operations and never found it. And Heaven help whoever tries to find the source on Condition Red.

Nemesis could do with a little filling out not that the movie offers that much. It's just so hard to use TNG movie property stuff because Continuing mission only lets you play with Generations. And EE uses and first contact set icon which kinda leaves Nemesis in some weird limbo area.

+1 for Nemesis. I am hoping the Nemesis/TNG Movies set, when it finally comes, will include either:

(a) a change or erratum for Federation Flagship: Relaunched, allowing it to work more broadly, or

(b) a formal change to the definition of so that the icon is treated as an era icon, rather than its incredibly narrow current definition. I don't have a problem with icons gaining expanded meaning; I just want that meaning recorded in the rulebook somewhere.

(yes yes I know, somebody will now post the image of Kathryn Janeway (The Sky's The Limit) as a giant icon winking at me, I'm ready, bring it on)

[AllenGould]

The Marquis. More. All. Go.

Maquis could easily fill out another set (or two).

[Boffo97]

I was just mentioning Spock's Brain the other day. Only one card's image traces to that episode, Yeoman Vaughn, and if that's not a mistake, then designers were cheating a bit as Vaughn is supposedly .

At the very least, one of the most infamous episodes ever deserves at least a Dilemma that clearly comes from it.

[Spectre9]

Condition Red is easy.

It's the Corbomite Maneuver about 10 mins in.

Do I get a cookie?

[jadziadax8]

[emoji514]


Sent through Subspace from the Starship Enterprise

[Discovery rox]

apparently i identified the last three tng cards not yet identified.

[Se7enofMine]

- not a specific storyline but DS9 in general. Given that the power curve for them is pretty meh right now, seems like a two'fer

- if that is too general, then Dominion War

- Andorians

- Xindi

[Discovery rox]

Side note, but if you're really good at placing images, you can help us out by doing just that. Follow that link, click on one of the categories that interests you, and you can identify images or correct mistakes.

-crp

it wont accept my submissions for voyager. overrun is from scorpion part 1.

the other shows accepted my submissions.

[aabecame]

Space Seed - Wrath of Khan
I, Mudd - Mudd's Women
The Augments - Cold Station 12 - Borderland
What are little girls made of?

[Takket]

so many good ideas!

I'd like to see some more holoprograms. Specifically from Emergence TNG of Take me out to the holosuite DS9. Lots of characters to be made from both those programs.

[Tim]

What about The Motion Picture crew? I've always liked the suits and aesthetic of that movie.

Would have to come up with something really original to avoid making another entirely redundant or unbalancing crew, but done right it would be cool.

[HoodieDM]

#1 Dominion War
#2 Terok Nor (Bajoran Occupation)
#3 TNG Cardassian/Maquis
#4 Xindi affiliation
#5 Relativity
#6 DQ Feds

[edgeofhearing]

The answer is clearly The Vengeance Factor.

[BCSWowbagger]

The answer is clearly The Vengeance Factor.

Yes, so I gather.

[Armus]

Off the top of my head, I've always thought that Return of the Archons is an underserved episode with a lot of potential.

Really? I always viewed this episode as the "Spirit Folk" of TOS: it highlights, in sharp detail, every single one of the show's biggest flaws.

You're coming at it from the perspective of "is this a good episode?" which is the wrong take. Of course it's not a good episode but that's not the point.

From the perspective of card development the perspective should be "is there good card-making material in this episode?" And on that count, the answer is absolutely "yes!"