Yes Dysons sphere could get more stuff. @Kevins suggestion
Yes DC is powerful and could be balanced (or at least not become more powerful) @what I think sebbel @Caretaker's Guest is suggesting
Yes, the online meta is very powerful (depending on who is attending, see rating, even if it is not an absolute indicator). I don´t know if its the toughest environment as I don´t know all local metas. @I agree to @Ensign Q here partly. Even thought people who are not playing online could be powerful too as @stressedoutatumc implies which I could also understand, yet I don´t know if he really *is*. Finding it out is a call q can make and stressautomatic agree or disagree too.
nobthehobbit wrote: ↑Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:06 pm
I've split off about the playability and impact of cards like Disrupted Continuum and Dyson Sphere Door here.
Also, @Ensign Q, please refrain from "my meta is stronger than your meta" schoolyard-esque taunting.
I actually say it is ok to be confident and make assessments of one owns ability to be better or worse then others in a certain area or about a certain game meta, is fair, otherwise judgements are pointless and everyone is allowed to have an option. Also, even if I have blocked ensign q, I like to point out the other side of the conflict should be taking into account as well to have an adult conversation and seeing both sides. Being called "arrogant" by @stressedoutatumc or "jerk" by
@Global moderators MidnightLich is not a paragon behavior either and pointing as a moderator
@nobthehobbit out be fair and would show the courage that even the lead of the trekcc should behave and would set an example that everyone should behave.
IMO its the classic conflict of people who are confident/aggressive and people who are doubtfull/passive aggressive. The one is no better or worse then the other. Both is an expression of personally they should be treated equal, if that "everyone is welcome stuff IDIC" is really to be lived...
I (more and more) choose to be confident in the areas I am and love myselve and have @stressedoutatumc on my block list, as I know what I can do and where I stand for and don´t like people who are simply doubling others instead of being confident themselves and make qualified statements or talking about their competence instead of belittling others on the basis of "inclusivity > exclusivity" (Quote @stressedoutatumc while doing that exact exclustion attempts by it...) I was and I party am critical of others, but I think stepping up and doing once own thing and being confident of once own work is better, which is the road I am on more and more. But that is just my point of view, that has its place thought too.
Thats why I make a stand for confidence and seeing both sides, even if that means pointing at the person in power and maybe being counter attacked for it directly (or indirectly by passive-aggressive people). But I think that post is defiantly word worth spreading! :thumbs-up:
Also there is a good middle ground of non-aggressive, non-passive aggressive called assertive.
thx for reading.
You woudn´t mind a Balanced Interactive Multiplayer Game with simplified rules, themed pre-constructed decks? see
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=45643&start=15 or join
https://discord.com/invite/rsRy5GV or PM