#568521
Let´s give it a fancy name:
diversely flavoured preconstructed MULTIPLAYER Scenario
The scenario rules are done and tested. 2-4 player possible and multiple matches can be played by different groups (3-4 player each). Its unoffcial/unsanctioned. Its for fun, not rating.
Group Philosophy for playing friendlies:
You don´t mind easier rules by cutting some of them (Quadrants, Infilrator etc.)? You like to be friendly and contribute positively to the health of the group? Woudn´t mind have a rules discussion end, when most agree, or play like: I allow you this IF you then you are tolerant if I have a rule question: mutual gentlements agreements, while all members needs to be gentlemen equaly? while being allowed to say no to anyone, even people in power and not be forced to cooperate if its a bad deal for you, yet wished to be constructive and contribute to the group? Congratulating others on wins, instead of blaming them? Being congratulated if you win, instead of being blamed/critisized? Mind play online Multiplayer instead of 1:1 solitary for a change? No deck building required, choose from all affiliations and sub-factions.
Multiplayer Features:
Do you like to have equal chance of winning by being provided a easy to play deck?
Do you love themed? where each deck is themed, and has really different affiliation flavor-mechanics? (60-cards draw deck each).
Do you like interactive Multiplayer (2, 3 or 4) with flexible victory sets to ensure a certain time frame for the game?,
You like a meaningful spaceline, that is symmetric and equal to all players, has different path and is fun to those who played the earlier access version? You woudn´t mind a seedphase that is completed in up to 5 minutes even if there are 4 player?
Do you have many people in your local area?
Or don´t you mind trying the free online approach?
Mind talking to me? It seems I am an as*hole yet maybe I am also simply competent for creating MP scenarios and a good group provider , attracting the right people and repell the wrong ones?
You don´t mind hear more about the MP format before you try it?
shipnerd: use my new server that now serves that purpose to ask and to schedule games. to be invited
(talk to me in trekcc or dojo discord, PM or Skype)
I am open for casual matches (even with individuals to get to know each other). Most decks (30 decks) are equal. I also got some more powerful or less powerful decks (Fed, Dominion Borg, as their where powerful in the series) then the most, so if you are inexperienced and want an advantage I give you one. or you are experienced and want other to show the format you can choose a weaker deck (maybe the all-women deck, or other themed niches) and be on equal terms with the one you train.
Final acceptance to the entire group is if you and I agree that we both want to be part in such a group, or if we come to a better idea of group philosophy for friendly matches
I also suggested it being an unsanctioned/unrated scenario for the Trekcc.
Edit many times: removed some grammar and spelling errors and clarified the meanings, I am german, not a native speaker
diversely flavoured preconstructed MULTIPLAYER Scenario
The scenario rules are done and tested. 2-4 player possible and multiple matches can be played by different groups (3-4 player each). Its unoffcial/unsanctioned. Its for fun, not rating.
Group Philosophy for playing friendlies:
You don´t mind easier rules by cutting some of them (Quadrants, Infilrator etc.)? You like to be friendly and contribute positively to the health of the group? Woudn´t mind have a rules discussion end, when most agree, or play like: I allow you this IF you then you are tolerant if I have a rule question: mutual gentlements agreements, while all members needs to be gentlemen equaly? while being allowed to say no to anyone, even people in power and not be forced to cooperate if its a bad deal for you, yet wished to be constructive and contribute to the group? Congratulating others on wins, instead of blaming them? Being congratulated if you win, instead of being blamed/critisized? Mind play online Multiplayer instead of 1:1 solitary for a change? No deck building required, choose from all affiliations and sub-factions.
Multiplayer Features:
Do you like to have equal chance of winning by being provided a easy to play deck?
Do you love themed? where each deck is themed, and has really different affiliation flavor-mechanics? (60-cards draw deck each).
Do you like interactive Multiplayer (2, 3 or 4) with flexible victory sets to ensure a certain time frame for the game?,
You like a meaningful spaceline, that is symmetric and equal to all players, has different path and is fun to those who played the earlier access version? You woudn´t mind a seedphase that is completed in up to 5 minutes even if there are 4 player?
Do you have many people in your local area?
Or don´t you mind trying the free online approach?
Mind talking to me? It seems I am an as*hole yet maybe I am also simply competent for creating MP scenarios and a good group provider , attracting the right people and repell the wrong ones?
You don´t mind hear more about the MP format before you try it?
shipnerd: use my new server that now serves that purpose to ask and to schedule games. to be invited
(talk to me in trekcc or dojo discord, PM or Skype)
I am open for casual matches (even with individuals to get to know each other). Most decks (30 decks) are equal. I also got some more powerful or less powerful decks (Fed, Dominion Borg, as their where powerful in the series) then the most, so if you are inexperienced and want an advantage I give you one. or you are experienced and want other to show the format you can choose a weaker deck (maybe the all-women deck, or other themed niches) and be on equal terms with the one you train.
Final acceptance to the entire group is if you and I agree that we both want to be part in such a group, or if we come to a better idea of group philosophy for friendly matches
I also suggested it being an unsanctioned/unrated scenario for the Trekcc.
Edit many times: removed some grammar and spelling errors and clarified the meanings, I am german, not a native speaker
Last edited by ShipNerd on Sun Feb 20, 2022 9:50 am, edited 39 times in total.
You woudn´t mind a Balanced Interactive Multiplayer Game with simplified rules, themed pre-constructed decks? see viewtopic.php?f=24&t=45643&start=15 or join https://discord.com/invite/rsRy5GV or PM