#569036
Just curious. I usually find what I need but thought it might be a good resource if it's out there. Preserver Obelisk
EHCCGPP wrote:Only in this game is nuking whales from orbit considered a completely legitimate strategy.
EHCCGPP wrote:Continued Existence + Pretty Cards > Continued Existence
winterflames wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:28 am Wouldn't Thelev also name Coridan? The link on Preserver obelisk isn't actually to 23rd Century Missions, just Planet Named in Lore by personnel.i think that works
eberlems wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:36 am Don't think so, or is Lt. Stiles mentioning Earth and Romulan/us?as per colon rule, it only mentions earth i think. but romulus isnt on the card anyway
Professor Scott wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:02 pm I would say no to both. He is mentioning a war between 2 locations; he is not mentioning the locations themselves. If the war would have been called the Terran-Reman war instead, we wouldn't even raise an eyebrow.Yeah but it's not called that.
JeBuS wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:34 pm I think this one works. Based on Kor names Kahless in lore via 'Sword of Kahless' and Zegov's lore names both Sisters of Duras and Duras. It appears that you are allowed to break out the sub-words of a compound noun.I disagree... if 'Sword of Kahless' in lore is equal to Kahless in lore, then Lt Data in lore and Lt Commander Data in lore must also equal Data in Lore, which clearly is not true.
Professor Scott wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:57 pmTime to pull out the glossary apparently.JeBuS wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:34 pm I think this one works. Based on Kor names Kahless in lore via 'Sword of Kahless' and Zegov's lore names both Sisters of Duras and Duras. It appears that you are allowed to break out the sub-words of a compound noun.I disagree... if 'Sword of Kahless' in lore is equal to Kahless in lore, then Lt Data in lore and Lt Commander Data in lore must also equal Data in Lore, which clearly is not true.
Named in Lore wrote: A personnel or ship card is named in the lore of another card if the lore refers to that personnel or ship by name. The named card's title must exactly match the full name given by the lore, including any capitalized modifiers such as ranks, titles, or descriptors. For example, I.K.C. K'elric names Captain Kang in lore, but does not name Kang in lore; Ezri names Mr. Brunt in lore, but not Brunt; Gorta's lore names Duras, but not Sisters of Duras.So I think the glossary refutes this particular argument.
A planet is named in the lore of another card if the lore refers to the location text of that planet mission (see mirror universe).
The capitalization of articles ("a", "the") may be disregarded. (Both Bareil and 0413-Theta name The Intendant in lore.) Standard word form variations, such as declined or possessive nouns, do not "break" a match. (Jadzia Dax is named in Els Renora's lore, despite the apostrophe + s after "Dax.")
Context matters for determining whether the lore is actually naming the subject. Incidental uses of a word, like "One" in Kovat's lore, do not count. For example, Telle mentions "data" in lore, but does not name Data; Kor's lore does name Kahless (who owns the "Sword of Kahless"); and Zegov's lore names both Sisters of Duras and Duras.
*dramatic noise* *suspends play* 0KF19 Kaiserfe[…]