User avatar
 
By VioletBlaze (Violet Edgar)
 - Beta Quadrant
 -  
#568901
I would definitely read it as +4 total, not +4 for missions and another +4 for objectives. Otherwise it would have probably have been worded more like, "missions... [+4 max] or... objectives... [+4 Max]" , or, "... [4 max each]".
User avatar
 
By SudenKapala (Suden Käpälä)
 - Delta Quadrant
 -  
#568903
What @VioletBlaze says, but slightly improved: the card says plus 4. If the limit was meant to refer to any (or all) of the tabled card groups mentioned, given the rest of the card's wording, it should have given one or more numbers only (i.e., "max 4"); as-is, the plus sign makes it clear that it is the attrib modification which is limited.

(As such, the + signs in Violet's post should be omitted IMO; for the rest, I agree fully.)
NE Oklahoma, SE Kansas?

Yes, it was at Redeemer in Bartlesville. Unfortuna[…]

Apologies for the delays in the results. They will[…]

MW for doctorjoya over tykajada 35-0. GG! :cheers[…]

The sacred cow in 1E for me is: Not Oversimplifiyi[…]