User avatar
 
By VioletBlaze (Violet Edgar)
 - Beta Quadrant
 -  
#568901
I would definitely read it as +4 total, not +4 for missions and another +4 for objectives. Otherwise it would have probably have been worded more like, "missions... [+4 max] or... objectives... [+4 Max]" , or, "... [4 max each]".
User avatar
 
By SudenKapala (Suden Käpälä)
 - Delta Quadrant
 -  
#568903
What @VioletBlaze says, but slightly improved: the card says plus 4. If the limit was meant to refer to any (or all) of the tabled card groups mentioned, given the rest of the card's wording, it should have given one or more numbers only (i.e., "max 4"); as-is, the plus sign makes it clear that it is the attrib modification which is limited.

(As such, the + signs in Violet's post should be omitted IMO; for the rest, I agree fully.)

First: Saru Last: Burnham I think @jadziadax[…]

So with the new version of The Final Frontier , i[…]

FIRST pair? You got more cooking? I am hoping t[…]

Card Page Glitches

So, it's seeming on some sets that the cards on th[…]