Fritzinger wrote:So I came out thinking "Wonder Woman was good enough to be Marvel, Captain Marvel was bad enough to be DC"... But my wife convinced me that I might have missed some things so I'm going to see it again. Maybe.
This is a good take, but you’re either being too harsh on Captain Marvel or too generous to DC. I gave Captain Marvel a C+, and I meant it: a slightly-better-than-average passing grade. There aren’t any Marvel movies that are worse than a D+, and I can’t think of an example of one that’s worse than a C+ off the top of my head. (Thor 2? But I barely remember it so how bad could it be?)
Meanwhile Wonder Woman was so unusually good for DC that I still haven’t seen Justice League because I don’t want them to rub DCEU nonsense all over my beautiful Amazon lunatic idiot. (Diana’s one weakness is that she’s kinda dumb, which is good for the character, saves her from being a Mary Sue, same dynamic as Pike being kinda dumb on Discovery.)
Anyway, Brie Larson seems like a good actress with some quirky different mannerisms. I appreciated the 90s quirks, the story had some elements that made this an actual woman's story (not just woman playing a man), and the Marvel salutes. Maybe with the exception of the Marvel vs Mar-Vell that was just too far past the 4th wall.
Good call on “this is actually the story of a woman” which is often missing from genre fiction. (I’m not sure even Ripley really counts as not “a woman playing a man”.)
But the Mar-Vell/Marvel thing is the same issue as “isn’t she kind of a Mary Sue?” Yeah, it’s dumb, but take it up with Stan Lee.
(Again, I remain shocked by the restraint of not even implying any romantic interest between Carol and Nick Fury.)
tiresome and comical in an impotent, flaccid sort of way.