#569044
I temporaly put ( I meant past tense in my post in Misinterpred History thread) Armus on my ban list, during the endless loop of Misinterpred history discussion, to try to find a solution to it. Reading into it that i want Nob/mods ban Armus from the forum is Nobs responsibility. I did not and do not care for Armus being banned. Him being Head Moderator once explains some things to me though.
I made clear Armus "may be as unconvinced as he likes" and i love myselve. Being warned hours *after* that for Nob thinking i have a problem with other people having an opinion. Thats nobs responsibility. Feel free to believe A in the MH thread, i still go for B, even if Armus, Nob or other would have a problem with it.
Suggesting to mods to close the thread, was not the best idea, but suggesting things is totally fine, as adult people can just say yes or no to it.
It is still my right to feel frustrated that discussing with Armus (or in any endless loop) is pointless. Calling it a day and leave everyone his opinion is a
good ending, which i initiated regarding Armus there. So I choose not to discuss with him any further. Which is my free decision.
Yes i am a suggester/contributor. Originaly I suggested to Charlie not to call Ensing Q names and pointed that out to Nob/Mods, suggesting a more paragon behavior as Mods. Both ignored it, unless you count the later warning and calling me Jerk in public (warning) and private message afterwards, as its their responsibility, not mine. I can live with being called a jerk by people. Yet i choose not to consider that behavior a good company for me.
I love myselve, suggest things, be fine with armus not banned (put him on my personal ban list and afterwards tried to understand where he is coming from). I have any right to be frustrated (or have any other feeling) and end caring for armus or Nobs opinion, as i love myselve and do not care for doing a "advocate system" or official request to the mods to appologize. I talked to SuddenKapple how the advocate to moderator system work, but decide against his help. After seeing SuddenKapplas attitude after that, i decide not to have anything to do with him either. I would mod different as it was my post in MH thread after the warning, but that is just me. I would stopp endless loops if 2 sides are not willing to agree to the other (which is fine), as it otherwise get messy and hard to read for others.
Those who care can see all that in the forums. Those who not is also fine. I love myselve, so even if understand would be great, i do not necessary need it. i do not need praise, or lack of criticism from Nob, Charlie, Armus, SuddenKapplas or anyone. I again thank everyone for teaching me that lesson more and more. Free learning.
I consider that if my suggestions/contributions I do for 1 year behind the scenes too, are ignored, stalled/no concrete answer from charlie to MP/Ent-E set, stolen (not currently) or punished, i might choose a community that i care more for. So far still wait for a yes or no to the multiplayer format, as there are a few player I currently care for, like Nial, James(Rules), Maggie etc.
If Mods ban me for suggesting something to them, or having an own opinion or they try to claim other reasons out of their head, that is your responsibility and i can live with it. I don´t want to be around those boss/mod types anyway. I do suggest you love yourselves instead of warn/ban other thought, then you would see my true lovly reasons instead of reading something else into it.
It is in my free choice to consider to stopp contributions (level-up system, that maggie now wants to complete, answering rule questions in the forum, point out balance issues in the past and present, offer cards to design/be a designer (immense ship list) (Ent-E Fed only theme), the multiplayer format /decks for it etc.). Please make a statement about if you want to use the multiplayersystem as unranked scenario. I also asked Jebus to merge my Tournament profile so that I could run tournaments. But that was just a few days ago, I wait some longer, no time pressure here.
However, if a year of free suggestions/contribution/work is not appreciated in my judgment, responded in reasonable time (Leveup up was january 2021, Multiplayer was the most reason suggestion, so 1-2 month for MP) or even punished i might make the choice for you to no longer contribute. Then you would lose a contributor, player, the work i did for free and i free time for other hobbies and other people.
thx for reading.
I made clear Armus "may be as unconvinced as he likes" and i love myselve. Being warned hours *after* that for Nob thinking i have a problem with other people having an opinion. Thats nobs responsibility. Feel free to believe A in the MH thread, i still go for B, even if Armus, Nob or other would have a problem with it.
Suggesting to mods to close the thread, was not the best idea, but suggesting things is totally fine, as adult people can just say yes or no to it.
It is still my right to feel frustrated that discussing with Armus (or in any endless loop) is pointless. Calling it a day and leave everyone his opinion is a
good ending, which i initiated regarding Armus there. So I choose not to discuss with him any further. Which is my free decision.
Yes i am a suggester/contributor. Originaly I suggested to Charlie not to call Ensing Q names and pointed that out to Nob/Mods, suggesting a more paragon behavior as Mods. Both ignored it, unless you count the later warning and calling me Jerk in public (warning) and private message afterwards, as its their responsibility, not mine. I can live with being called a jerk by people. Yet i choose not to consider that behavior a good company for me.
I love myselve, suggest things, be fine with armus not banned (put him on my personal ban list and afterwards tried to understand where he is coming from). I have any right to be frustrated (or have any other feeling) and end caring for armus or Nobs opinion, as i love myselve and do not care for doing a "advocate system" or official request to the mods to appologize. I talked to SuddenKapple how the advocate to moderator system work, but decide against his help. After seeing SuddenKapplas attitude after that, i decide not to have anything to do with him either. I would mod different as it was my post in MH thread after the warning, but that is just me. I would stopp endless loops if 2 sides are not willing to agree to the other (which is fine), as it otherwise get messy and hard to read for others.
Those who care can see all that in the forums. Those who not is also fine. I love myselve, so even if understand would be great, i do not necessary need it. i do not need praise, or lack of criticism from Nob, Charlie, Armus, SuddenKapplas or anyone. I again thank everyone for teaching me that lesson more and more. Free learning.
I consider that if my suggestions/contributions I do for 1 year behind the scenes too, are ignored, stalled/no concrete answer from charlie to MP/Ent-E set, stolen (not currently) or punished, i might choose a community that i care more for. So far still wait for a yes or no to the multiplayer format, as there are a few player I currently care for, like Nial, James(Rules), Maggie etc.
If Mods ban me for suggesting something to them, or having an own opinion or they try to claim other reasons out of their head, that is your responsibility and i can live with it. I don´t want to be around those boss/mod types anyway. I do suggest you love yourselves instead of warn/ban other thought, then you would see my true lovly reasons instead of reading something else into it.
It is in my free choice to consider to stopp contributions (level-up system, that maggie now wants to complete, answering rule questions in the forum, point out balance issues in the past and present, offer cards to design/be a designer (immense ship list) (Ent-E Fed only theme), the multiplayer format /decks for it etc.). Please make a statement about if you want to use the multiplayersystem as unranked scenario. I also asked Jebus to merge my Tournament profile so that I could run tournaments. But that was just a few days ago, I wait some longer, no time pressure here.
However, if a year of free suggestions/contribution/work is not appreciated in my judgment, responded in reasonable time (Leveup up was january 2021, Multiplayer was the most reason suggestion, so 1-2 month for MP) or even punished i might make the choice for you to no longer contribute. Then you would lose a contributor, player, the work i did for free and i free time for other hobbies and other people.
thx for reading.
You woudn´t mind a Balanced Interactive Multiplayer Game with simplified rules, themed pre-constructed decks? see viewtopic.php?f=24&t=45643&start=15 or join https://discord.com/invite/rsRy5GV or PM