Actually, I thought "unphased" was really funny as a joke-name, but I do see the confusion it brings to the board in this franchise, so "stoic" it would have been.
However... Do you really, specifically, want them NOT to have names (and instead, have only a generic description)?
In that case:
No. Nope. Uh-huh. No.
I hate that!
(
)
Star Wars CCG did that; cards like Rebel Trooper, Stormtrooper, Such-and-such Technician, etc. -- and it is one of the reasons that STCCG appeals to me more. SWCCG did mention imagined names for such characters in their lore, but it was not the same to me.
E.g., ❖
Jace Michaels was given that name -- he is not named in the episode! -- because the actor's name is Michael Jacen. I really appreciate that he has a name. He's in my deck, and I wouldn't want a guy who's called "Token Executive Officer" in my deck. His
name is
Robert Paulson Jace (or Commander Michaels).
In the same vein, the name Thomas McClure was given by Decipher. (He is not ❖ , though.) Which became a funny story later, but -- there's many examples of course, of names that Decipher and TCC thought up. (But I also really like how
Suzanne Dumont was a name/lore they took from an actual TNG episode.)
So, while I'd support such personnel, I'd be opposed to create them without a proper name. Let's think of one for the "stoic cop" -- which can be in his lore. "Unphased", too.
Officer Small. (Too obvious?)
Officer Laffalotte. (He had NO sense of humour, IIRC; but too obvious?)
Officer Sam Crowe. (Because a biker cop -- SAMCRO -- Sons Of Anarchy MC Redwood Original. I like that one.)
There's so many ways to go with names! This was only a quick stroll down "funny" lane.